Rants of the day

[rootofnewt]

I don't understand why parents feel they have the right to modify their child's genitals for mere cosmetic reasons. It's cruel, it's barbaric, and it's a violation of the child's bodily integrity. I think it's ridiculous that we have laws protecting girls from circumcision, but it's perfectly okay to mutilate boys.

- - -

Unrelated to this, I also despise evil nannies and am trying to out a particular beast via our local parenting groups.

Comments

[circumspectly.livejournal.com]

I've never understood why parents want to mutilate a perfectly functioning penis...I mean, so it makes it easier for parents to clean...gee...maybe we should cut off the exterior ears, eh? *sheesh*

[krasota.livejournal.com]

That's the thing--it's not easier to clean a cut penis.

The intact penis is easy-peasy to clean on a newborn. The foreskin is fused to the glans, so absolutely no retraction. Just wipe it off like a finger.

A newly circumcised penis requires wound care and attention.

[mmymoon.livejournal.com]

Old people penis, on the other hand -- oh my lord, but I've cleaned up a lot of horrors in my life!

[krasota.livejournal.com]

And another argument for removing ears at birth! Old people ears!

I find lots of food under my boobs, maybe I should cut them . . . oh, wait. I do want to do that.

AS A CONSENTING ADULT.

[circumspectly.livejournal.com]

Well see then? I have bought into the myth of the medical folk...having never had a little boy (or a little girl, for that matter), I've just gone along with the popular dialog. So, it's just pain for no other reason than the old myth put forward by the Bible? Cripes. :\

[krasota.livejournal.com]

Actually, routine medical circumcision was initially brought forth in the US as a means to curb masturbation. It worked really well. *rolls eyes* Oh, and to cure nocturnal emissions, epilepsy, and bedwetting, among other things.

You might find this interesting to read:
http://www.icgi.org/medicalization/

[circumspectly.livejournal.com]

Okay, I'm reading the whole thing, but so far I'm like, "WTF?"...this shit is....SHIT!

[melody-rossiter.livejournal.com]

reminds me of hysterectomies to cure hysteria and depression.

[mmymoon.livejournal.com]

People use that as an excuse to do that to dogs, sooooo...

If you don't want to dig crammed-in poop out of various interesting locations, don't obtain a child!

[circumspectly.livejournal.com]

I have no interest in obtaining a child at my ripe old age...also, I don't crop ears or tails of my lovely pets. I was merely spouting what I'd been led to believe. I'm 44...no worries about children here...but I clean up plenty of poo, given that I have two of the most adorable pups ever put on earth.

Now.

[ljvb.livejournal.com]

I have a dane with natural ears and still has his tail.. however.. I swear sometimes I want to cut that tail off.. it has a mind of its own, and enough power to take any male out in short order (his tail is at waste hight and has perfect aim...)

Actually, in all honesty, tail cropping on some dogs is not always done for pure looks, but also to prevent painful breaks later on in life, but this is usually related to large breed dogs... My dane will be 200 pounds soon.... and I will have to switch from pet food to small children.. its cheaper :) (I am kidding about the children part.. unless you take into account my neighbours kid who is a terror...) :)