Child safety seats
Apr. 2nd, 2009 10:57 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I'm glad to see that the AAP has revised their carseat recommendations. They now recommend that children rear-face to the maximum height/weight restrictions of their converstible car seat or a *minimum* age of two.
http://aapnews.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/30/4/12-a
Ronan is still rearfacing, of course. It's something like 5x safer. He's only 22lbs and wee, so he has a ways to go and will likely outgrow rearfacing in his Boulevard by height before weight (33lbs, it's an '07 model).
http://www.cpsafety.com/articles/stayrearfacing.aspx
http://aapnews.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/30/4/12-a
Ronan is still rearfacing, of course. It's something like 5x safer. He's only 22lbs and wee, so he has a ways to go and will likely outgrow rearfacing in his Boulevard by height before weight (33lbs, it's an '07 model).
http://www.cpsafety.com/articles/stayrearfacing.aspx
no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 12:12 am (UTC)It's not about what I feel, it's about what crash test videos show. Go ahead and check out some of the videos on forward facing for toddlers.
Once a child is too big for a seat, it is no longer safe. We need seats that fit children for *longer* periods in rearfacing positions and in harnessed positions. Sadly, the law is for a paltry 12mo and 20 or 22lb minimum in most states, which means that many people turn around skull-heavy infants FAR too early.
Many people think a child has outgrown rearfacing just because their legs hit the seat or just because they hit the legal minimum. If the child is not too tall in the torso and not too heavy, the seat still fits. As I said, broken legs are far less serious than severing the spinal cord.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 12:46 am (UTC)